Approximate Reasoning in Surgical Decisions

نویسنده

  • Elisabeth Rakus-Andersson
چکیده

Approximate reasoning is one of the most effective fuzzy systems. The compositional rule of inference founded on the logical law modus ponens is furnished with a true conclusion, provided that the premises of the rule are true as well. Even though there exist different approaches to an implication, being the crucial part of the rule, we modify the early implication proposed by Zadeh [1] in our practical model concerning a medical application. The approximate reasoning system presented in this work considers evaluation of a risk in the situation when physicians weigh necessity of the operation on a patient. The patient’s clinical symptom levels, pathologically heightened, indicate the presence of a disease possible to recover by surgery. We wish to evaluate the extension of the operation danger by involving particularly designed fuzzy sets in the algorithm of approximate reasoning. Keywords—Approximate reasoning, compositional rule of inference, Zadeh’s implication, operation risk, symptom levels, parametric membership functions.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

PROPERTY ANALYSIS OF TRIPLE IMPLICATION METHOD FOR APPROXIMATE REASONING ON ATANASSOVS INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS

Firstly, two kinds of natural distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets are generated by the classical natural distance between fuzzy sets under a unified framework of residual intuitionistic implication operators. Secondly, the continuity and approximation property of a method for solving intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning are defined. It is proved that the triple implication method for intuitio...

متن کامل

Decision Rules Acquisition Based on Consistent Objects in Ordered Information Systems with Fuzzy Decisions ⋆

In an Ordered Decision Information System (ODIS), upper (lower) consistent objects are considered, and used to cope with inconsistency of the system and draw “at least” (“at most”) decision rules. The upper (lower) consistent objects are described by generalized decisions of the objects, and thereby generalized conveniently to the Ordered Decision Information System with Fuzzy (FODIS) decisions...

متن کامل

Deductive Approximate Reasoning | a Comparison of Two Approaches

This paper deals with deductive approximate reasoning techniques. Approximate reasoning is concerned with the appropriate processing of vague and uncertain knowledge, given in a rule based manner. The role model for dealing with vague and uncertain knowledge is the human mind. The ability to build abstractions and vague concepts lies at the heart of the immense capabilities of the human brain. ...

متن کامل

Transparent Provenance Derivation for User Decisions

It is rare for data’s history to include computational processes alone. Even when software generates data, users ultimately decide to execute software procedures, choose their configuration and inputs, reconfigure, halt and restart processes, and so on. Understanding the provenance of data thus involves understanding the reasoning of users behind these decisions, but demanding that users explic...

متن کامل

توانایی استدلال اخلاقی پرستاران و دانشجویان پرستاری: مطالعه‌ای مروری

The principal objective of the nursing profession is to provide evidence-based and competent care mainly based on humanitarian and ethical principles. Ethical care is contingent on a proper level of moral reasoning, which can be categorized into pre-conventional, conventional and post-conventional reasoning. At the pre-conventional level, individuals are mostly self-oriented and prefer obedienc...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009